I moved to San Jose, California, in 2005. I was fresh out of college – filled with 100% idealism and very little life experience. I can honestly say, in hindsight, that “ignorance is bliss.” I’d much rather be young and dumb then older and informed. I remember voting for Al Gore and Barack Obama – I had the luxury and privilege to vote based on emotional messaging tactics (Hope, Yes We Can, We Aren’t Going Back), as opposed to what policies and leader will truly look out for my family and most vulnerable in the broader community. I have changed so much – and part of that growing process is the realization these broader messages of “hope” aren’t based in reality. They are a tool to get young, privileged and easily manipulated people to vote against their community’s best interest.

I am certain of this after living in California for nearly 20-years (especially the last 10-years) – and after doubling down on Democrats, as I voted for Hilary, then Biden. I truly believed they had my family’s best interest in mind. But, in all honesty – they lied to me and you – some people have realized this, and others are still fooled by emotional messaging intended to create hatred toward a candidate like Donald Trump.

What do I mean? Well, California has become the progressive policy lab for criminal justice reform (i.e., no bail, lowering consequences, releasing prisoners – even violent felons), housing and drug policy. It also taxes its residents more than any other state – and is in the top 5 for residential energy and housing cost. It has, by a huge margin, the largest homeless unsheltered crisis in the country, and these aren’t just poor people down on their luck. The 190,000 “homeless”, many mentally ill and addicted or illegal immigrants roam the street by the thousands in major cities, like San Jose. We have seen massive escalations in overdoses, along with open air drug use. I can’t take my kids for a walk without seeing someone having a mental health crisis, or doing something obscene like exposing themselves. I call downtown San Jose, an area I once loved, “an open air drug use site and insane asylum.” Parks that I used to take my kids to have RVS and illegal camps all over them – many of the people living in these areas are dangerous to themselves and others.

The worst part of it all?

Families like ours pay extreme prices to live here – and all of the taxes and contributions from citizens go to waste. Problems just grow. To send our two youngest to preschool + rent = $90,000/year. This doesn’t factor in food, energy, cable, gas, insurance, etc., all items that cost more here than anywhere else.

California has gutted its middle class – leaving only people with a whole lot of resources, or none at all, leading to massive deficits without any new real sources of revenue. At some point – the state of California will need a federal bail-out – but I predict it gets far worse here before that happens.

People ask me: “well, Leif, then why do you stay?” First, from 2005 to circa 2015, downtown San Jose was awesome! It felt like a suburb in a big city. I used to take my oldest daughter everywhere downtown – we had a movie theater, university, constant events, clean parks – and there simply wasn’t the thousands of mentally ill/addicts overtaking all of our public spaces. Now, and as I mentioned before, three out of the four parks my daughter and I used to frequent are now giant unsanctioned illegal camps that are a public health and safety risk. These camps have disease outbreaks like Shigella, overdoses and violent crimes.

I can’t believe how the leaders of California have failed their citizens. And, ultimately, we are here because our oldest daughter, Lila, is with us 50% of the time, as her Mom/Stepdad (cool people) are from this area. I tried to move – we even had an offer on a home accepted in Pennsylvania in a beautiful community – but during contingency I terminated the agreement because I couldn’t leave my Lila here. She became my whole life when she was born, and I need to be close to protect her. With that said, the other two are suffering because of my decisions – and they deserve a community with leaders who will provide good schools, affordable homes and clean parks. I’m a simple guy – I don’t need much, but everything is being taken from us in downtowns in California. From Sacramento to San Diego – our communities are being destroyed while we pay a premium.

Earlier, I mentioned my voting track record. Why? Because during my time in California – I have seen progressive policy after policy be implemented (initially with my support/vote) – many, including Prop 47, with Kamala Harris’s support and input. Prop 47 essentially decriminalized drugs, leading to surges in overdoses on our streets to where it’s normal to see someone be brought back to life with Narcan. And, it compelled addicts from far and wide to come take advantage of counter-productive drug policy – they camp everywhere and the things kids have to see going to school are considered insane/illegal in 49 other states. I refuse to normalize the human suffering I see day in and day out. It has impacted my psyche in such a negative way. Prop 47 also lowered consequences for criminals, leading to California becoming the #1 retail theft state in the nation. Hoards of people storming Walgreens, Targets, Jewelry Stores, etc., just taking whatever they want. Even if they are arrested, they get released immediately and recommit. Retail theft is a thriving business for criminals in California, and has compelled many small, medium and large businesses to close.

The progressive policies don’t work. Full stop. Housing First, Harm Reduction, no-bail, Prop 47, etc., they all are flaming trainwrecks that need to be stopped immediately. What California really needs is federal intervention to shelter and support the 190,000 people that state leaders say “just need an apartment.” It’s off the rails.

I may be stuck in a state for now with the highest real poverty rate, highest taxes, highest rates of homelessness, near highest energy/housing costs, bottom 15% public schools, ever soaring insurance rates, near highest gas prices – where it’s $90,000 a year just to live and have your kids in preschool.

I may – but you don’t have to be.

Please do not vote for Kamala Harris for President. Of course, you will decide for yourself – but I am just warning everyone at this point.

I personally will vote for Trump because I realize I was conditioned to hate him intentionally by the Democrat elites who are terrified to lose power – as they locked my kids out of school, forced them to mask and covid test at school – and treated them like such shit. I will never forgive this state – don’t vote to expand what is happening here to your communities.

Note: photo taken in 2024 one block from San Jose City Hall – many addict/mentally ill occupy business storefronts/entry ways. As part of the “Harm Reduction” program – the County spends millions per year targeting illegal/homeless camps giving addicts needles (they don’t exchange, so needles scattered around City), pipes and training them on how to use drugs. Harm Reduction is what I call “assisted suicide.” This program directly correlates with massive overdose increases and open air drug use/markets.

Join the Conversation

  1. ddimitrie55's avatar
  2. leifandlila2008's avatar

3 Comments

  1. The “Housing First” model has been studied and implemented in the US, Canada, European countries and many other places. I have read about it. It does not make any sense, but its founder and supporters swear by it and they convince cities, counties, countries and provinces to put it in place. Emergency shelters are losing funding to this program.

    Even though, my country, Canada has studied and gone whole hog into Housing First, I have to wonder how many Canadians know what is happening. They will find out when emergency shelters close their doors.

    I visited San Francisco and San Jose in 1987. I loved it. It was clean and safe. I’m sad to see what you have written.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for your comment! I worked in housing development and homeless interventions in the Bay Area, CA, for about 10-years. Recently, I resigned because the roadmap to solve these issues is an objective failure that goes unacknowledged. It will happen in Canada, too, unless leaders change course. Now, Housing First can work for certain populations that do NOT have severe mental illness, addiction or chronic health issues requiring skilled care. This would include elderly on fixed incomes or working poor families with children or individuals with disabilities that are high functioning. Sadly, California, Oregon and Washington states have allocated Housing First resource to populations like addicts, mentally ill – and the outcomes are horrendous. For perspective – Housing First is found to address zero root causes for addicts/mentally ill and an addict is 19x more likely to overdose in a Housing First apartment, then on the streets. I am pasting several studies below for your reference, demonstrating what I am saying.

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427255/

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958978/

      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31581024/

      Advocate for all Housing First resources to be allocated to the elderly, poor families and the high functioning disabled. Housing First as applied is killing people who need treatment and skilled care and harming communities.

      Like

    2. Canada one payer universal medical insurance plan for all Canadians is more generous than the pay as you go systems I read about in the US. In fact many US citizens simply do without medical care, mental health care, physiotherapy and so many other services that Canadians enjoy and cherish dearly. I live in a border City, Windsor, Ontario Canada. Life one mile across the Detroit River is like living on another planet for the hundreds of thousands of poor Detroiters.

      The problem in Canada with the “Housing First” model is not that it doesn’t house more people. It does. It also cuts down on emergency room visits, police calls and ambulance calls. A place to hang one’s hat in privacy can’t be underestimated.

      However “Housing First” goes further and states that this housing is provided with “no strings attached.” Participants only have to accept mental health or addiction assistance as they choose. The whole model is “client-centered.” It’s called “low-barrier treatment.” The hope is that once people are housed they will readily accept all the medical and social services if they can find them.

      Even Canada’s universal health care system is not free or infinite. In fact it eats up about a third or more of each province’s budget as well as billions of dollars from the federal government. There are as well many services that are not covered in Ontario such as physiotherapy, optometry and many more. Private psychologists, social workers counselors, addiction treatment centers (rehab) are all pay as you go. There are years long waiting lists for many of these services in the public system if you can access them at all.

      Seniors who need hip or knee replacements go years until it’s their turn. I have to wonder how Canada’s universal health and social welfare system will provide any and all “wraparound services” to newly housed persons when they choose to access them. They too will join the lengthy waiting lists for treatment, surgeries, counselling, psychologists, dentists etc. “Housing First” cannot guarantee these services a la carte when you happen to be ready for them.

      Like

Leave a comment

Leave a reply to leifandlila2008 Cancel reply